CONCORD, N.H. — A New Hampshire Democratic lawmaker’s criticism of a local police chief for attending a rally preceding the attack on the U.S. Capitol prompted her being removed from her committee assignments while some officials voiced support for the chief.
Rep. Rosemarie Rung, of Merrimack, tweeted a video of rioters breaking through barriers and confronting police.
“Wow. These terrorists need to be locked up,” she wrote on Jan. 7. “I want to know who is from NH besides the police chief from Troy, NH.”
Chief David Ellis has faced criticism for attending the rally in Washington before the riot, but has not been accused of participating in violence.
Officials on Troy’s Select board have defended Ellis, and said they had to shut down their town hall after people called with profanities and threats of violence against board members.
House Speaker Sherman Packard, R-Londonderry, said he stripped Rung of her committee assignments because she contributed to the backlash against Ellis.
Rung said she didn’t call Ellis a terrorist and believes the speaker should be more outraged by the attack on the Capitol than he is about her tweets. She also accused Packard of being misogynistic in telling her she should apologize for her tone.
Republican state representatives who recently shared racist and anti-Semitic content on social media have been criticized by Democrats, but haven’t faced any consequences from House leadership.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less