I have read the continuing arguments both for and against the increase in fines imposed on distracted drivers in recent weeks and I am completely in support of an increase. Choosing to text behind the wheel is just as dangerous as choosing to drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs. In all three cases people are a deadly threat to other drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians, and give up their right to leniency by making those choices.

I read in a recent Sentinel of various groups who are opposed to the increase (“Maine considers steeper fines to deter distracted driving,” Feb. 5). Alysia Melnick’s testimony on behalf of Maine’s ACLU speaks to the effect an increase would have on people who don’t have the resources to pay the fines.

In my opinion, that is on the person who texted while driving, and defending the fairness of a fine falls on the deaf ears of those who died or were grievously injured at their hands. Fines, loss of their licenses, and even jail time should be equal to the consequences imposed on those who drive under the influence. Responsibility for making the stop is on the police, and while I sympathize with the scrutiny and care needed to make that decision, the choice of leniency can send the wrong message as well.

I have narrowly escaped being hit by erratic drivers who cross into my lane or veer back and forth across the highway. I have been tailgated by people who are looking at their laps. I have been lucky while others have not. A rigorous deterrent is needed to curb bad decisions that are consciously made.

Robin Johnson

Waterville