Last month, Santa Monica, Calfornia’s only public recycling buyback center closed after the City Council declined to renew its contract with the company that operated it. On the surface, the council’s move may seem shocking for a city that has been at the forefront of trash-reduction efforts. But given the collapse in the market for recycled paper and plastic, it was an understandable decision.

Just a couple of years ago, the city earned about $300,000 a year from the sale of paper, plastic, glass and other materials collected at the center and from curbside bins. Under the proposed new contract, the city would have to pay $1 million a year.

This is not a story about the end of recycling in Santa Monica, which will still have curbside collection for bottles, cans and paper. But it is a cautionary tale — one among many playing out across the nation — about the end of easy and profitable recycling due to the meltdown of the global recyclables market.

Last year China, the world’s largest buyer of recyclable material, stopped accepting most scrap plastic and paper. For a while, other countries such as Vietnam and Malaysia accepted some of the material China rejected, but they quickly became overrun and in some cases burned plastic material or dumped it in makeshift landfills.

Local governments across the country are struggling to balance the rising costs of collecting recyclables — costs passed on to residents through trash collection fees — with the knowledge that much of the stuff they pay to divert from the trash will end up in the landfill anyway.

There’s still a strong domestic market for the cans and bottles collected as part of California’s bottle bill, but not for paper and plastic. Some cities, such as San Diego, are sucking up the costs to continue their programs in the hope that the market will get better. Others have stopped accepting material for which they can’t find a buyer. And at least one city, Deltona, Florida, decided to scrap its recycling program altogether rather than pay the higher costs. It probably won’t be the only one to do so.

There is a bright light here. The recycling crisis has exposed this lie: that the ever-growing stream of single-use packaging is manageable if only consumers were more diligent in their recycling efforts. The public has noticed that plastic trash is ending up in the ocean anyway.

Thanks to this awareness, it will be tougher for lawmakers to avoid taking action to cut off trash at the source. Happily, that’s already happening. This year, New York, Maine and Vermont joined California in banning single-use plastic grocery bags. And California lawmakers are considering a radical new law that will fundamentally transform, for the better, how products are packaged in this state; the measure would bar manufacturers from selling products in California that are packaged in containers that can’t be recycled.

The time for states to take such measures is now. As Santa Monica’s story shows, the costs of inaction are too high — for Californians and for the environment.

Editorial by the Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed